To strengthen reporting, recordkeeping, risk management, and operational resilience
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 Regulatory Insights
听冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲冲
January 2024
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Division of Examinations (Division) issues a聽聽in which it shares observations, based on examinations and outreach, related to security-based swap dealers' compliance with relevant rules and requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The Division aims to remind security-based swap dealers of their obligations under the relevant rules and encourage them to consider improvements in their compliance programs, policies, procedures, and internal controls.
The Division states that, in general, some security-based swap dealers did not 鈥渆stablish, maintain, or enforce reasonably designed policies and procedures addressing applicable Exchange Act requirements鈥� while some did not comply with these requirements, including Regulation SBSR (which 鈥済overns the regulatory reporting and public dissemination of security-based swap transactions and requires market participants to report security-based swap information to a registered security-based swap data repository鈥�). Observations concerning four specific areas were highlighted by the Division:
1.聽 聽Reporting of Security-Based Swap Transactions and Correction of Reporting Errors:聽The Division observed that some dealers failed to report certain security-based swap trade data within the required timeframes or to accurately report trade information. Examples include reporting inaccurate notional amounts, misreporting underlying asset information, and failing to adequately report counterparty identifications. The Division also noted that 鈥渋n many instances鈥�, these failures were related to weak internal controls and processes for ensuring accurate reporting, and that some securities-based swap dealers lacked procedures to identify and correct reporting errors.
2.聽 聽Business Conduct Standards:聽The Division identified several issues related to security-based swap dealers' compliance with business conduct standards (Exchange Act Rule 15Fh-3(h)) as well as some security-based swap dealers that did not establish a system to address the minimum requirements, including procedures to:
3.聽 聽Security-Based Swap Trading Relationship Documentation and Portfolio Reconciliation: 鈥�Exchange Act Rule 15Fi-5 requires each security-based swap dealer to establish, maintain, and follow written policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the execution of written security-based swap trading relationship documentation with each counterparty that complies with the requirements of the Rule.鈥� The Division observed that some dealers did not:
4.聽 聽Recordkeeping:聽The Division found that certain dealers did not consistently maintain complete and accurate records as required under the Exchange Act Rules 17a-3 and 18a-5. Examples included incomplete or inaccurate trade blotters, counterparty listings, and associated person listings.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) separately proposes rules applicable to CFTC-supervised Swap Dealers (SDs) and Major Swap Participants (MSPs), including proposals to:聽聽
Swaps: SEC Examinations Risk Alert; CFTC Proposals
To strengthen reporting, recordkeeping, risk management, and operational resilience
Download PDFPoints of View
Insights and analyses of emerging regulatory issues and their impact.
Regulatory Insights View
Series covering regulatory trends and emerging topics
Regulatory Alerts
Quick hitting summaries of specific regulatory developments and their impact.
乐鱼(Leyu)体育官网 Regulatory Insights is the thought leader hub for timely insight on risk and regulatory developments.