ÀÖÓ㣨Leyu£©ÌåÓý¹ÙÍø

• Supervision insight: Expands view into SEC regulatory examination and supervision process.
• Risk-based: Sets examination selection of investment advisors and risk areas.
• Firm-specific risks: Based on risk characteristic (e.g., activities, regulatory history), as well as tips, complaints, referrals.
• “Typicalâ€� requests: Provides ‘typicalâ€� examination documents and information requests.

• The SEC Division of Examinations issues a  on the risk-based approach the Division staff uses for selecting SEC-registered investment advisers (advisers) for examination and determining the scope of risk areas to examine, as well as to provide a list of typically requested documents and information.

Selecting Documents to Request. As part of the examination process, Division staff will send an adviser a letter containing an initial request list identifying information, including documents, for review, including:

• General information, such as organizational information, business and operations, disclosures and filings, and legal and disciplinary issues.
• Information about the compliance program, risk management, and internal controls, such as compliance program structure and oversight processes, valuation, and information processing, reporting, and protection.
• Information to facilitate testing with respect to advisory trading activities, including information about clients and accounts, portfolio management, brokerage and trading, and conflicts of interest and insider trading.
• Information for the Division staff to perform testing for compliance in various areas, such as those related to marketing and advertising, financial records, and custody.

Note: The Risk Alert provides an attachment containing a more detailed list of information that is initially requested in examinations.

The currently released Risk Alert follows a , which similarly outlines the setting of examination scope and listing of typically requested information and documents while also providing Division staff observations from examinations of newly-registered advisers. Division staff encourages all advisers to review their compliance policies and procedures, disclosure documents and filings, and marketing in light of the issues identified in these examinations. The findings included:

• Compliance policies and procedures that: (1) did not adequately address certain risk areas applicable to the firm; (2) omitted procedures to enforce stated policies; and/or (3) were not followed by advisory personnel, typically because the personnel were not aware of the policies or procedures, or the policies or procedures were not consistent with their businesses or operations.
• Disclosure documents that contained omissions or inaccurate information related to advisersâ€�: (1) fees and compensation; (2) business or operations (including affiliates, other relationships, number of clients, and assets under management); (3) services offered to clients, such as disclosure regarding advisersâ€� investment strategy (including the use of models), aggregate trading, and account reviews; (4) disciplinary information; (5) websites and social media accounts; and (6) conflicts of interest.
• Marketing materials that appeared to contain false or misleading information, including inaccurate information about advisory personnel professional experience or credentials, third-party rankings, and performance as well as information and/or claims that advisers were unable to substantiate.